The best dividend ETFs in 2026: compare SCHD’s quality screen, JEPI’s monthly income and NOBL’s 25-year standard, plus fees, trailing yields and key risks.
Table of Contents
Dividend ETFs are not a single category. They run from quality-focused funds like SCHD, with a moderate yield and a record of dividend growth, to options-enhanced funds like JEPI, which distribute high but variable income in exchange for capped upside. Which one is “best” depends on whether you prioritize current income, income growth, or total return.
That choice carries a real tension. A high yield is not automatically good. It can signal a falling share price (a yield trap), an unsustainable payout, or a strategy that gives up growth potential.
This list serves three investor profiles: income-now investors (JEPI, JEPQ, DVY), quality-and-growth investors (SCHD, VIG), and reliability-first investors (NOBL). VYM rounds out the list as a broad, low-cost core option.
We screened on expense ratio, assets under management, dividend consistency, strategy clarity, and what each fund adds that the others do not. Expense ratios range from 0.04% (VYM, VIG) to 0.38% (DVY). Trailing 12-month yields as of October 2026 range from roughly 1.6% (VIG) to about 11% (JEPQ). Those yields are historical and move with prices and distributions.
Best Dividend ETFs at a Glance
| ETF | Strategy | Expense Ratio | Trailing Yield | Div. Freq. | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHD | Four-factor quality and dividend-growth screen | 0.06% | ~3.0–3.2% | Quarterly | Best Overall Dividend ETF |
| VYM | Broad forecast-yield selection, ~600 holdings | 0.04% | ~2.4% | Quarterly | Broad Dividend Diversification |
| JEPI | Active S&P 500 equities plus ELN option income | 0.35% | ~8.0–8.2% | Monthly | High Monthly Income |
| VIG | 10+ consecutive years of dividend increases | 0.04% | ~1.6% | Quarterly | Dividend Growth Investors |
| JEPQ | Nasdaq-100 equities plus ELN option income | 0.35% | ~11.1–11.6% | Monthly | Technology-Focused Monthly Income |
| DVY | High-yield screen, value tilt | 0.38% | ~3.5% | Quarterly | High Current Yield (Value Tilt) |
| NOBL | S&P 500 stocks with 25+ years of increases, equal-weighted | 0.35% | ~2.2% | Quarterly | Dividend Reliability (Aristocrats) |
Data as of October 2026, sourced from Yahoo Finance and fund issuer websites. All yields shown are trailing 12-month figures and fluctuate as share prices and distributions change. JEPI and JEPQ yields are particularly variable — monthly distributions depend on options premium income tied to market volatility. Yields shown are historical and do not represent guaranteed future income.
Understanding Dividend ETF Strategies Before You Invest
The yield trap. A high yield can mislead. If a share price falls sharply, the yield rises mathematically even when the dollar distribution stays flat or shrinks. An investor who buys on yield alone may be buying a depressed asset rather than a generous income producer. Always read yield alongside total return history and distribution stability.
Current yield vs. dividend growth. VIG and SCHD favor companies that grow their dividends, even when the starting yield is modest. A fund yielding 1.6% whose payout grows 10% a year can distribute more dollars after 10 years than a fund yielding 3.5% with flat payouts. Both approaches are valid. The right one depends on whether you need income today or growing income later.
Options-enhanced income. JEPI and JEPQ draw a large share of their distributions from selling options through equity-linked notes (ELNs), not from stock dividends alone. That income is variable and may be taxed as ordinary income. The trade-off is capped upside in strong bull markets.
With these distinctions in mind, the ETFs below each occupy a clearly different position in the dividend investing landscape.
How We Selected These Dividend ETFs
We applied the following criteria:
- Size and history: at least $1 billion in assets and three years of operating history.
- Distinct strategies: each fund represents a different income approach, and we excluded funds that duplicate coverage already on the list.
- Transparent costs: expense ratios run from 0.04% (VYM, VIG) to 0.38% (DVY). We included higher-cost funds only where they offer genuinely different exposure.
- Options funds, with disclosure: JEPI and JEPQ are widely held by income investors, so excluding them would leave the list incomplete. Their ELN mechanism and yield variability are disclosed in full.
- No single-sector funds: we excluded utilities-only and REIT-focused high-yield ETFs because their concentration risk is inappropriate for a general dividend list.
- NOBL despite its lower yield: no other fund here represents the Dividend Aristocrats standard of 25+ consecutive years of increases, a meaningfully different quality signal.
Each ETF on this list represents a distinct approach to dividend investing. The right choice depends on your income timeline, tax situation, and tolerance for yield variability.
1. SCHD — Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF: Best Overall Dividend ETF
Why we picked SCHD
SCHD earns the top spot because of how it selects stocks, not because of its yield. The Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index ranks companies on four factors: cash flow to total debt, return on equity, dividend yield, and five-year dividend growth rate. The result is about 100 holdings of companies whose cash flow has supported ongoing and growing dividends, not simply the highest payers available.
SCHD’s yield is not the highest on this list, by design. As of October 2026, its trailing 12-month yield was approximately 3.0% (Yahoo Finance shows an indicated 3.24%). That is below DVY and the options funds. The fund trades some current yield for quality and growth, at a 0.06% expense ratio, among the lowest available for a screened dividend ETF.
Key facts
| Metric | SCHD |
|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06% |
| AUM | ~$107.9 billion |
| Avg Daily Volume | ~23.0 million shares |
| Trailing Yield | ~3.0% |
| # Holdings | ~100 |
| Index Tracked | Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index |
| Dividend Frequency | Quarterly |
| Fund Structure | Open-end fund |
| Inception Date | Oct 20, 2011 |
Historical performance
SCHD has returned +33.0% over one year and +18.8% annualized over three years (Yahoo Finance, as of 10/20/2026). Its five- and ten-year annualized returns were +10.0% and +13.2% (Yahoo, as of 9/10/2026). On Yahoo’s figures it outpaced its Large Value category over one, three and five years. Its total return has lagged the S&P 500 during strong technology-led rallies, which is expected given its value-tilted holdings. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Dividend amounts are not guaranteed and may be reduced.
Pros
- Four-factor quality screen filters for financial health, not just yield level
- Historically strong dividend growth rate alongside a competitive current yield
- Low 0.06% expense ratio for an actively screened dividend fund
- ~100 concentrated holdings of established dividend-paying companies
Cons
- Less diversified than VYM (~600) or VIG (~330), with the top 10 at ≈41.5% and heavy Consumer Defensive, Healthcare and Energy weights
- Has underperformed the S&P 500 and growth ETFs during technology-led bull markets, and annual reconstitution can shift holdings sharply
- Quarterly distributions — investors needing monthly income should consider JEPI
Best for
SCHD may suit long-term investors who want a core dividend holding balancing yield and dividend growth at very low cost. It could be a weaker fit for those seeking maximum current income or heavy technology exposure.
Read our full SCHD ETF review →
2. VYM — Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF: Best for Broad Dividend Diversification
Why we picked VYM
VYM’s defining trait is breadth. With about 600 holdings, it owns roughly six times as many companies as SCHD, spreading risk across sectors and market caps. The FTSE High Dividend Yield Index selects stocks on forecast dividend yield, without SCHD’s multi-factor quality screen. That captures more high-yielding companies but applies no financial-health filter beyond yield eligibility.
As of October 2026, VYM’s trailing 12-month yield was approximately 2.4% (Yahoo Finance), below SCHD’s at present. Its 0.04% expense ratio is even lower than SCHD’s 0.06%.
Key facts
| Metric | VYM |
|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04% |
| AUM | ~$95.8 billion |
| Avg Daily Volume | ~1.15 million shares |
| Trailing Yield | ~2.4% |
| # Holdings | ~600 |
| Index Tracked | FTSE High Dividend Yield Index |
| Dividend Frequency | Quarterly |
| Fund Structure | Open-end fund |
| Inception Date | Nov 10, 2006 |
Historical performance
VYM’s NAV returned +21.5% over one year and +17.4% annualized over three years as of 6/30/2026, with +11.8% (five-year) and +11.6% (ten-year) annualized per Vanguard. Yahoo Finance showed +15.9% (one-year) and +18.9% (three-year annualized) as of 10/9/2026. Its ten-year figure sits modestly below SCHD’s +13.2%, though the dates differ. Sector mix explains some of the gap: VYM is led by Financials (21.7%) and Technology (17.0%), while SCHD leans on Consumer Defensive, Healthcare and Energy.
Pros
- ~600 holdings, with the top 10 only ≈26% of assets
- Ultra-low 0.04% expense ratio, the lowest on this list
- Long track record (since 2006) and deep liquidity
- Balanced sector exposure across Financials, Technology, Healthcare and Industrials
Cons
- No quality or dividend-growth screen, so it includes some financially weaker high-yielders
- Current yield (~2.4%) is below SCHD, DVY, JEPI and JEPQ
- Broadcom is ~7% of the fund, so the “dividend” label carries sizable technology exposure
Best for
VYM may suit investors who want a simple, ultra-cheap, diversified high-dividend core holding. It could be a weaker fit for those wanting the highest yield, a quality screen, or options-based monthly income.
Read our full VYM ETF review →
3. JEPI — JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF: Best for High Monthly Income
Why we picked JEPI — and how it generates its income
Start with the mechanism. JEPI is actively managed and holds roughly 100+ S&P 500 stocks. It also sells equity-linked notes (ELNs), instruments that work like covered calls on the S&P 500. Premium from those notes, alongside stock dividends, funds the monthly distribution. When volatility is high, premiums rise and JEPI tends to pay more. When markets are calm, premiums fall and distributions decline.
As of September 30, 2026, JEPI’s trailing 12-month yield was approximately 8.0% per JPMorgan (Yahoo Finance showed about 8.2% in October). Monthly distributions have varied, roughly $0.34 to $0.45 per share over the past 12 months (dividend.com).
Selling options caps upside. JEPI does not fully participate in strong S&P 500 rallies, which is the direct trade-off for the income. A portion of ELN-generated income may also be taxed as ordinary income rather than at the lower qualified dividend rate.
Key facts
| Metric | JEPI |
|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% |
| AUM | ~$45.3 billion |
| Avg Daily Volume | ~4.4 million shares |
| Trailing Yield | ~8.0% (JPM, 9/30/2026); variable |
| # Holdings | 129 total incl. ELNs (JPM, 7/31/2026) |
| Index Tracked | None — actively managed (benchmark: S&P 500) |
| Dividend Frequency | Monthly |
| Fund Structure | Open-end fund (active) |
| Inception Date | May 20, 2020 |
| Tax Note | ELN income may be taxed as ordinary income |
Historical performance
As of 9/30/2026, JEPI’s NAV returned +6.62% over one year, +10.05% annualized over three years and +7.78% over five, per JPMorgan. The S&P 500 returned +15.74%, +22.89% and +13.79% over the same periods. The gap is expected behavior for a fund that sells upside for income. In 2022, JEPI returned about −3.5% while the S&P 500 fell about 18%. Its one-year standard deviation was 7.66 versus 13.25 for the S&P 500 (JPM, 8/31/2026). Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Pros
- High, variable monthly income through the options overlay
- Lower volatility than the S&P 500, with smaller drawdowns in down years such as 2022
- Monthly payments that may align with regular expenses
- JPMorgan active management with a transparent strategy
Cons
- Variable monthly distributions cannot be budgeted as fixed income
- A portion may be taxed as ordinary income — taxable-account holders should consult a tax advisor
- Upside is capped, so it has underperformed the S&P 500 in strong bull markets
Best for
JEPI may be most appropriate for investors who need current monthly income and understand its yield variability and upside limitation. It could work best in a tax-advantaged account.
Read our full JEPI ETF review →
4. VIG — Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF: Best for Dividend Growth Investors
Why VIG is for income growth investors, not income-now investors
VIG’s current yield is the lowest on this list, and that is intentional. As of October 2026, its trailing 12-month yield was approximately 1.6% (Yahoo Finance). The S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index selects companies with 10+ consecutive years of dividend increases and excludes the top 25% highest-yielding stocks. It prioritizes dividend reliability and growth over current payout size.
As an illustration only: a 1.6% yield on cost whose dividend grows 8% annually would equal about 5% on the original investment after 15 years. That is arithmetic, not a forecast, and dividend growth is never guaranteed.
VIG holds about 330 stocks. Technology is ~27% of the fund, so it can behave more like a broad-market ETF than a classic dividend fund.
Key facts
| Metric | VIG |
|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04% |
| AUM | ~$127.6 billion |
| Avg Daily Volume | ~1.00 million shares |
| Trailing Yield | ~1.6% (lower by design) |
| # Holdings | ~330 |
| Index Tracked | S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index |
| Dividend Frequency | Quarterly |
| Fund Structure | Open-end fund |
| Inception Date | Apr 21, 2006 |
| Requirement | 10+ consecutive years of dividend increases |
Historical performance
VIG’s NAV returned +17.5% over one year and +15.4% annualized over three years as of 6/30/2026, with +10.9% (five-year) and +13.1% (ten-year) annualized per Vanguard. Yahoo Finance showed +14.2% and +17.4% as of 10/16/2026. Its ten-year figure is close to SCHD’s +13.2%, despite a yield roughly half as large.
Pros
- Dividend growth may help income keep pace with inflation over time
- ~330 holdings across technology, financials and healthcare
- Competitive total return (+13.1% annualized over ten years)
- Ultra-low 0.04% expense ratio
Cons
- Lowest current yield among all funds on this list
- Technology (~27%) and top-five concentration (≈21%) diverge from classic dividend behavior
- Quarterly distributions, with little exposure to Utilities, Energy or Real Estate
Best for
VIG may suit long-term investors who want dividend growth and total return rather than current income. It could be a weaker fit for anyone who needs high yield now.
Read our full VIG ETF review →
5. JEPQ — JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF: Best for Technology-Focused Monthly Income
Why JEPQ belongs alongside JEPI — and how it differs
JEPQ uses the same ELN income mechanism as JEPI but builds its equity portfolio from the Nasdaq-100 instead of the S&P 500. That means heavy technology exposure: Information Technology was about 51% of the fund as of 9/30/2026. The Nasdaq-100’s higher volatility generally produces larger option premiums, and so a typically higher yield than JEPI.
As of September 30, 2026, JEPQ’s trailing 12-month yield was approximately 11.6% per JPMorgan (Yahoo Finance showed about 11.1%). The same disclosures apply as for JEPI: distributions are variable, a portion may be taxed as ordinary income, and upside is capped. JEPQ’s record is also shorter, with inception in May 2022 versus May 2020.
Key facts
| Metric | JEPQ |
|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% |
| AUM | ~$44.3 billion |
| Avg Daily Volume | ~6.1 million shares |
| Trailing Yield | ~11.1–11.6%; variable |
| # Holdings | ~109 |
| Index Tracked | None — actively managed (Nasdaq-100 base) |
| Dividend Frequency | Monthly |
| Fund Structure | Open-end fund (active) |
| Inception Date | May 3, 2022 |
| Tax Note | Same ordinary-income risk as JEPI |
Historical performance
As of 9/30/2026, JEPQ’s NAV returned +19.5% over one year and +21.8% annualized over three years, per JPMorgan, with +16.9% annualized since its May 2022 launch. The Nasdaq-100 returned +24.0% and +28.3% over the same one- and three-year periods, the upside cost of the options overlay. JEPI returned +6.6% and +10.1% over those periods, but the two funds hold very different portfolios. A five-year record is not yet available.
Pros
- Typically higher yield than JEPI
- Nasdaq-100 exposure adds technology upside within an income framework
- Monthly payments
- Same transparent ELN strategy as JEPI
Cons
- Significantly shorter track record than JEPI
- Higher technology concentration means more sector risk (top 10 ≈43.5%)
- Same yield variability and ordinary-income tax issues as JEPI
Best for
JEPQ may suit investors who want JEPI-style income with additional technology exposure and accept greater concentration. It could be a poor fit for those seeking diversification or stable payouts.
Read our full JEPQ ETF review →
6. DVY — iShares Select Dividend ETF: Best for High Current Yield (Value Tilt)
Why DVY offers the highest traditional dividend yield on this list
Among non-options funds, DVY carries the highest current yield here. As of September 30, 2026, its trailing 12-month yield was approximately 3.5% per iShares, matching Yahoo Finance. The Dow Jones U.S. Select Dividend Index holds roughly 100 of the highest-yielding U.S. stocks (excluding REITs), screened for dividend growth and payout ratio but without SCHD’s multi-factor quality filter.
The result is a value and defensive tilt. Per Yahoo Finance in October 2026, Financial Services was about 26% and Utilities about 22%, with Energy near 10%. DVY therefore behaves differently from SCHD and VYM across market cycles. The cost is real: its 0.38% expense ratio is far above SCHD’s 0.06% and VYM’s 0.04%.
Key facts
| Metric | DVY |
|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% |
| AUM | ~$22.2 billion |
| Avg Daily Volume | ~0.31 million shares |
| Trailing Yield | ~3.5% |
| # Holdings | ~98 |
| Index Tracked | Dow Jones U.S. Select Dividend Index |
| Dividend Frequency | Quarterly |
| Fund Structure | Open-end fund |
| Inception Date | Nov 3, 2003 |
| Sector Tilt | Financials, Utilities, Consumer Staples |
Historical performance
DVY’s NAV returned +10.8% over one year, +16.4% annualized over three years and +9.7% over five as of 9/30/2026 (iShares). Yahoo Finance showed +17.0% and +19.3% as of 10/20/2026. A ten-year annualized figure of about +10.3% appears in third-party data from October 2026. Value-led markets have favored DVY, while technology-led markets have favored growth-heavy funds.
Pros
- Highest traditional (non-options) yield on this list
- Dividend growth and payout-ratio screens, plus a record dating to 2003
- ~98 holdings, with the top 10 around 19–20%
- Value and cyclical exposure that may diversify growth-heavy portfolios
Cons
- 0.38% expense ratio is significantly above SCHD and VYM
- Financials, Utilities and Energy concentration creates cyclical risk
- Dividend growth is a secondary screen, so payouts may grow more slowly than SCHD’s or VIG’s
Best for
DVY may suit income-focused investors who want a higher yield than the broad dividend ETFs and accept a value tilt. It could be a weaker fit for cost-sensitive investors or those wanting technology exposure.
Read our full DVY ETF review →
7. NOBL — ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF: Best for Dividend Reliability
Why NOBL’s qualification standard is uniquely demanding
To enter NOBL’s index, a company must (1) belong to the S&P 500 and (2) have raised its dividend every year for at least 25 consecutive years. That record spans the 2000–2002 dot-com crash, the 2008–2009 financial crisis, and the 2020 pandemic. Roughly 70 companies qualify out of about 500. This is not a yield screen. It is a screen for corporate discipline and financial resilience.
The index is equal-weighted, so no stock exceeds about 1.8% and the top 10 is ≈17%. As of October 2026, NOBL’s trailing 12-month yield was approximately 2.2% (Yahoo Finance). The 0.35% expense ratio is higher than SCHD or VYM, reflecting the specialized index.
Key facts
| Metric | NOBL |
|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% |
| AUM | ~$10.95 billion |
| Avg Daily Volume | ~1.04 million shares |
| Trailing Yield | ~2.2% |
| # Holdings | ~70 |
| Index Tracked | S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index (equal-weighted) |
| Dividend Frequency | Quarterly |
| Fund Structure | Open-end fund |
| Inception Date | Oct 9, 2013 |
| Requirement | S&P 500 member + 25+ years of increases |
Historical performance
NOBL’s NAV returned +14.1% over one year and +8.4% annualized over three years as of 6/30/2026, with +6.6% (five-year) and +9.9% (ten-year) annualized per ProShares. Yahoo Finance showed +13.4% and +12.0% as of 10/19/2026. Its five-year figure trailed SCHD’s +10.0% (Yahoo, 9/10/2026), and equal weighting underweights the mega-cap growth names that have led recent rallies.
Pros
- Strictest dividend reliability test on this list (25+ years)
- Equal weighting avoids mega-cap concentration
- Underlying companies have demonstrated resilience across multiple crises
- A defensive sector mix that may soften drawdowns, though it cannot prevent losses
Cons
- 0.35% expense ratio is much higher than SCHD, VYM and VIG
- Yield (~2.2%) is below SCHD, VYM and DVY
- About 70 holdings, and it has lagged growth-heavy indexes in technology-led markets
Best for
NOBL may suit conservative income investors who prioritize dividend reliability and corporate financial discipline over yield magnitude. It could be a weaker fit for those seeking high current yield or the lowest fees.
Read our full NOBL ETF review →
How to Choose the Right Dividend ETF for You
If your goal is dividend quality and long-term income growth:
→ SCHD. Its four-factor screen selects financially healthy companies with growing dividends. Accept a moderate current yield in exchange for income that may grow over time.
If your goal is broad dividend income with lower concentration risk:
→ VYM. Its ~600 holdings provide far more diversification than SCHD’s ~100, at the lowest fee on the list. Its yield is currently lower than SCHD’s, with less rigorous quality filtering.
If your goal is maximum current monthly income and you understand the trade-offs:
→ JEPI (S&P 500 base) or JEPQ (Nasdaq-100 base, higher yield, more tech). Income fluctuates, upside is capped, and a portion may be taxed as ordinary income. Consult a tax advisor before investing in a taxable account.
If your goal is dividend income that grows over time (income you don’t need yet):
→ VIG. Its yield is the lowest on the list, but its 10+ year increase requirement prioritizes growth over immediate payout.
If your goal is the highest traditional (non-options) yield:
→ DVY. Accept its 0.38% expense ratio and heavier Financials and Utilities concentration.
If your goal is dividend reliability above all else:
→ NOBL. The 25-year standard is the most demanding filter available. Accept a lower yield as the cost.
Many dividend investors hold two or three of these ETFs rather than one — pairing SCHD’s quality with JEPI’s monthly income, for example. Consider your income timeline, tax situation, and risk tolerance. A financial advisor can help you determine the right dividend strategy for your situation.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best ETF for dividend income?
No single ETF is universally best; it depends on the investor. For maximum current monthly income, JEPI and JEPQ have offered the highest yields on this list, though their distributions are variable. For quality dividend income with a record of growth, SCHD’s four-factor screen has produced competitive results. For the most stringent reliability standard, NOBL’s 25-year requirement is unmatched. The “best” fund depends on whether you need income now, income growth, or reliability above all else.
Is a higher dividend yield always better?
Not necessarily. A very high yield can result from a falling share price rather than growing distributions, which is called a yield trap. If a fund’s price falls 30% while its dividend stays flat, the yield rises about 43% mathematically, yet the investor has lost money. Always evaluate yield alongside total return history, distribution stability, and the financial health of the holdings. SCHD’s screen explicitly attempts to avoid yield traps by requiring healthy cash flow and return on equity.
How are dividend ETF distributions taxed?
In the US, qualified dividends are taxed at the lower long-term capital gains rates (0%, 15% or 20% depending on income). Ordinary dividends are taxed at your regular income tax rate. A portion of JEPI and JEPQ distributions may be classified as ordinary income because ELNs, not stock dividends, generate it. The exact treatment depends on each year’s distribution breakdown. Consult a tax professional, particularly if you hold either fund in a taxable account.
Is SCHD better than VYM?
Neither is universally better; they serve different needs. SCHD’s screen selects fewer (~100) but more financially healthy companies and emphasizes dividend growth. VYM’s ~600 holdings reduce concentration risk and carry a 0.04% fee, with no quality filter. As of October 2026, SCHD’s trailing yield (~3.0–3.2%) was above VYM’s (~2.4%). SCHD’s ten-year return has also been higher on the figures cited above, though results shift with market conditions. Investors prioritizing quality and growth may prefer SCHD, those wanting broader diversification may prefer VYM, and some hold both.
How often do dividend ETFs pay out?
SCHD, VYM, VIG, DVY and NOBL distribute quarterly, typically around March, June, September and December. JEPI and JEPQ distribute monthly, which appeals to investors who match income to monthly expenses. Monthly frequency affects timing, not total income. Investors reinvesting dividends in tax-advantaged accounts may find payment frequency less meaningful than those who depend on distributions for spending.
Data as of October 2026. Sources: issuer websites and finance.yahoo.com.
Disclaimer: The information in this article is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial, investment, or tax advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Investing in ETFs involves risk, including possible loss of principal. Always consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.